Jun
26
“5.1 Sony Ericsson - Leading with almost top marks on toxic chemical phase out but poor on recycling.
5.1 Sony - High score for products free of the worst toxic chemicals and committed to cuts in it’s greenhouse gas emissions.
4.8 Nokia- Docked one penalty point for poor take-back practice in India. High renewable energy use.
4.5 Samsung - Scores well on chemicals and waste criteria. But very poor on energy issues.
4.5 Dell - Good on toxic chemicals and e-waste, but low score on energy issues.
4.3 Toshiba - Scores well on toxic chemicals but badly on e-waste and energy.
4.3 Acer - Good commitment to phase out toxic chemicals, but poor overall on e-waste and energy.
4.3 Panasonic - Several products free of toxic chemicals and good energy efficiency, but poor on e-waste.
4.3 Motorola- Average scores for toxic chemicals, e-waste and energy issues.
4.3 HP - Good on amounts recycled and committed to reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
4.1 Apple - Increasing number of products free of the worst toxic chemicals. Low scores on energy except for good energy efficiency in products.
3.9 Sharp - Good on toxic chemicals and energy efficiency but very poor on recycling.
3.9 Lenovo - Some points for toxic chemical commitment and good on product energy efficiency.
3.7 Philips - Top score on energy issues but zero on e-waste policy and practice.
3.7 Fujitsu Siemens - Some products free of the worst toxic chemicals but poor on e-waste and energy issues.
3.3 LG - Some points on toxic chemicals and e-waste but zero on energy.
2.15 Microsoft - Some commitments on toxic chemical phase out but poor on e-waste and energy issues.
0.8 Nintendo - Some improvement on toxic chemicals and commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions.” greenpeace guide to greener electronics (the numbers are the points scored, maximum was ten points)
|
5.1 Sony - High score for products free of the worst toxic chemicals and committed to cuts in it’s greenhouse gas emissions.
4.8 Nokia- Docked one penalty point for poor take-back practice in India. High renewable energy use.
4.5 Samsung - Scores well on chemicals and waste criteria. But very poor on energy issues.
4.5 Dell - Good on toxic chemicals and e-waste, but low score on energy issues.
4.3 Toshiba - Scores well on toxic chemicals but badly on e-waste and energy.
4.3 Acer - Good commitment to phase out toxic chemicals, but poor overall on e-waste and energy.
4.3 Panasonic - Several products free of toxic chemicals and good energy efficiency, but poor on e-waste.
4.3 Motorola- Average scores for toxic chemicals, e-waste and energy issues.
4.3 HP - Good on amounts recycled and committed to reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
4.1 Apple - Increasing number of products free of the worst toxic chemicals. Low scores on energy except for good energy efficiency in products.
3.9 Sharp - Good on toxic chemicals and energy efficiency but very poor on recycling.
3.9 Lenovo - Some points for toxic chemical commitment and good on product energy efficiency.
3.7 Philips - Top score on energy issues but zero on e-waste policy and practice.
3.7 Fujitsu Siemens - Some products free of the worst toxic chemicals but poor on e-waste and energy issues.
3.3 LG - Some points on toxic chemicals and e-waste but zero on energy.
2.15 Microsoft - Some commitments on toxic chemical phase out but poor on e-waste and energy issues.
0.8 Nintendo - Some improvement on toxic chemicals and commitment to cut greenhouse gas emissions.” greenpeace guide to greener electronics (the numbers are the points scored, maximum was ten points)
